← Project Checkwould $WOULD — Project Check
Is would legit or a rug? Here's an on-chain read of would ($WOULD) on solana — its liquidity, holder concentration, contract control, and whether its X account matches the official account on its CoinGecko listing. Community health isn't scored here; run the live check for that.
solana · J1Wpmugroo…9gpump
WOULD is workable but has some on-chain risks to weigh.
Flags
- Almost no trading ($4k / 24h vs $728k liquidity) — the market looks inactive.
- Valuation ($85.0M) is only 0.9% backed by tradable liquidity.
—
Verified contract
Contract status not checked.
84
Liquidity depth
Total liquidity is $728k.
35
Liquidity vs. valuation
Valuation ($85.0M) is only 0.9% backed by tradable liquidity.
15
Market activity
Almost no trading ($4k / 24h vs $728k liquidity) — the market looks inactive.
92
Token authorities
Mint and freeze authority revoked.
—
Liquidity lock
Liquidity lock not verifiable for this pool type.
94
Market age
Oldest market is 713 days old.
96
Supply overhang (unlock risk)
Supply is essentially fully circulating — little unlock overhang.
90
Holder concentration
Top 10 wallets hold 11.9% of supply.
78
Holder base
6,498 holders.
90
Market presence
20 liquidity pools across DEXes.
would — frequently asked
Does would have enough liquidity?
Total liquidity is $728k.
Is would's supply concentrated in a few wallets?
Top 10 wallets hold 11.9% of supply.
Can would's contract be changed or its supply minted?
Mint and freeze authority revoked.
Taking a deal with would?
Run the live check to add the community-health read — real vs manufactured engagement, and whether vetted creators actually engage — before you put your name on it.
Run the live check →On-chain and CoinGecko signals, cited — not financial advice. Always DYOR.