← Project CheckEthereum Name Service $ENS — Project Check
Is Ethereum Name Service legit or a rug? Here's an on-chain read of Ethereum Name Service ($ENS) on ethereum — its liquidity, holder concentration, contract control, and whether its X account matches the official account on its CoinGecko listing. Community health isn't scored here; run the live check for that.
ethereum · 0xc1836021…7f9d72
High on-chain risk — significant red flags for a KOL considering this project.
Grounding✓ @ensdomains verifiedNFTCoinGecko #185
Flags
- Top 10 wallets hold 84% of supply — concentrated; a few holders could sell into your audience.
- Almost no trading ($6k / 24h vs $820k liquidity) — the market looks inactive.
- Valuation ($172.8M) is only 0.5% backed by tradable liquidity.
- Owner is not renounced and the contract appears to include a mint function — supply could be inflated on holders.
- 59% of supply is uncirculated (FDV $422.6M vs mcap $172.8M) — future unlocks could dump on holders, including a KOL paid in this token.
100
Verified contract
Address is a deployed on-chain contract.
96
Official account verified
X account @ensdomains matches the official account on this token's CoinGecko listing.
87
Liquidity depth
Total liquidity is $820k.
21
Liquidity vs. valuation
Valuation ($172.8M) is only 0.5% backed by tradable liquidity.
15
Market activity
Almost no trading ($6k / 24h vs $820k liquidity) — the market looks inactive.
33
Contract control
Owner is not renounced and the contract appears to include a mint function — supply could be inflated on holders.
95
Sellability
No honeypot flag — token appears sellable.
—
Liquidity lock
Liquidity lock not verifiable for this pool type.
95
Market age
Oldest market is 1707 days old.
45
Supply overhang (unlock risk)
59% of supply is uncirculated (FDV $422.6M vs mcap $172.8M) — future unlocks could dump on holders, including a KOL paid in this token.
13
Holder concentration
Top 10 wallets hold 84% of supply — concentrated; a few holders could sell into your audience.
90
Holder base
67,774 holders.
90
Market presence
20 liquidity pools across DEXes.
85
Listing recognition
Listed on CoinGecko at market-cap rank #185.
Ethereum Name Service — frequently asked
Is Ethereum Name Service a honeypot? Can you sell it?
No honeypot flag — token appears sellable.
Does Ethereum Name Service have enough liquidity?
Total liquidity is $820k.
Is Ethereum Name Service's supply concentrated in a few wallets?
Top 10 wallets hold 84% of supply — concentrated; a few holders could sell into your audience.
Can Ethereum Name Service's contract be changed or its supply minted?
Owner is not renounced and the contract appears to include a mint function — supply could be inflated on holders.
Is Ethereum Name Service's X account the verified official one?
X account @ensdomains matches the official account on this token's CoinGecko listing.
Taking a deal with Ethereum Name Service?
Run the live check to add the community-health read — real vs manufactured engagement, and whether vetted creators actually engage — before you put your name on it.
Run the live check →On-chain and CoinGecko signals, cited — not financial advice. Always DYOR.